Search for: All records

ABSTRACT We present and discuss the optical spectrophotometric observations of the nearby (z = 0.087) Type I superluminous supernova (SLSN I) SN 2017gci, whose peak K-corrected absolute magnitude reaches Mg = −21.5 mag. Its photometric and spectroscopic evolution includes features of both slow- and of fast-evolving SLSN I, thus favoring a continuum distribution between the two SLSN-I subclasses. In particular, similarly to other SLSNe I, the multiband light curves (LCs) of SN 2017gci show two re-brightenings at about 103 and 142 d after the maximum light. Interestingly, this broadly agrees with a broad emission feature emerging around 6520 Å after ∼51 d from the maximum light, which is followed by a sharp knee in the LC. If we interpret this feature as Hα, this could support the fact that the bumps are the signature of late interactions of the ejecta with a (hydrogen-rich) circumstellar material. Then we fitted magnetar- and CSM-interaction-powered synthetic LCs on to the bolometric one of SN 2017gci. In the magnetar case, the fit suggests a polar magnetic field Bp ≃ 6 × 1014 G, an initial period of the magnetar Pinitial ≃ 2.8 ms, an ejecta mass $$M_{\rm ejecta}\simeq 9\, \mathrm{M}_\odot $$ and an ejecta opacity $$\kappa \simeq 0.08\, \mathrm{cm}^{2}\, \rm{g}^{-1}$$. A CSM-interaction scenario would imply a CSM mass $$\simeq 5\, \mathrm{M}_\odot $$ and an ejecta mass $$\simeq 12\, \mathrm{M}_\odot $$. Finally, the nebular spectrum of phase  + 187 d was modeled, deriving a mass of $$\sim 10\, {\rm M}_\odot$$ for the ejecta. Our models suggest that either a magnetar or CSM interaction might be the power sources for SN 2017gci and that its progenitor was a massive ($$40\, {\rm M}_\odot$$) star.